Russia Controls Ukraine’s Internet
In some parts of Ukraine occupied by Russia, Russia has also begun to occupy cyberspace. It has cut off Ukrainians in Kherson, Melitopol and Mariupol from the rest of the country, limiting their ability to access news about the war and communicate with loved ones. In some territories, the internet and mobile networks have completely stopped working.
Restricting internet access is part of a Russian dictatorship that is likely to be replicated further if it takes over more Ukrainian territory. The occupied areas are now under the control of a vast digital surveillance and censorship apparatus, with Russia able to monitor web traffic and digital communications, spread information and information flow management.
Russia’s rerouting and censorship of the Internet in Ukraine has little historical precedent. In 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea, a state telecommunications company built the infrastructure to redirect internet traffic from Crimea to Russia. Data from Ukrainian networks is now being redirected over those cables, the researchers say.
Cheat: To help people in those areas connect to the global internet, the Ukrainian government is providing free access to certain VPN services. Ukrainian officials are also seeking grants for routers and other equipment to bring internet service into bomb shelters, including equipment at schools.
In other news from the war:
The FBI’s search raises a series of questions
An FBI. Monday’s search of Donald Trump’s Florida home, with explosive legal and political implications, was raises new questions about the ex-president’s potential for prosecution and has fueled further partisan divisions.
Apparently contrary to the Presidential Records Act, Trump brought documents, including sensitive documents, to Florida when he left the White House. People familiar with the investigation said the Justice Department had become concerned about the whereabouts of possible classified information and whether Trump’s team was being finalized.
Trump aides and allies stepped up their criticism of the search yesterday, asserting, without citing any evidence, that it was a blatant use of prosecutorial authority for law enforcement agencies. political purposes and choose Trump as a victim. President Biden’s press secretary said he was not informed of the decision to conduct the search. The Justice Department has maintained public silence.
Story: Throughout his presidency, Trump flouted records preservation laws and was known for tearing up documents and, in some cases, flushing them down the toilet. The National Archives last year determined that many important presidential documents were missing and were believed to be in his possession.
Analysis: The Mar-a-Lago estate search was a high-risk gamble for the Department of Justice, but Trump faces his own riskMichael D. Shear, White House correspondent for The Times, writes.
Kenya tops the polls
Polls in Kenya The hotly contested presidential election ended yesterday after months of fierce and muddy jostling. Supporters cheered one of the frontrunners, Raila Odinga, the veteran opposition leader, in his Nairobi stronghold, while William Ruto, his rival and former vice president, praised his success. majesty of democracy after voting before dawn.
The Electoral Commission estimates turnout at 60% – a sharp drop from 80% turnout in the 2017 election, and an indication that many Kenyans, are marginalized. hurt by economic difficulties or affected by corruption, prefer to stay at home. In the days to come, the important question is not just who wins the race but whether the loser will accept defeat.
Past elections have led to difficult times involving allegations of vote-rigging, lengthy courtroom dramas, incidents of street violence and even a murder. secret. It can take weeks, even months, before a new president is sworn in. The polls in this election are too close to call and the counting of votes is still ongoing.
Result: The winning candidate needs more than 50% of the vote, as well as a quarter of the vote in 24 of Kenya’s 47 counties. Failure to meet that bar means a flow within 30 days. Analysts say the event is more likely to be a legal challenge. Any citizen or group can challenge the initial results in court within seven days.
Around the world
During their first year at US universities, women like Suhaila Hashimi, above, Taliban escapees are struggling to adjust – and remember their past.
“If I close my eyes, I will remember bad things,” she said. “I have experienced them. But it still feels better to think that it was all just a bad dream, and it never happened.”
Issey Miyaki, a Japanese designer known for her microscopic pleated outfits, died on friday at age 84.
ARTS AND IDEAS
Death by Instagram
Crowds have returned to one of the most popular selfie spots in New York, if not the world: the Brooklyn waterfront in Dumbo, where the arch of the Manhattan Bridge frames the Empire State Building in the distance. . People who live there don’t feel #beautiful, writes Ginia Bellafante in Big City column in The Times.
In what has become one of New York’s most beautiful neighborhoods, community members have complained about congestion at the site, as well as the thriving economy around it – the parade of Food trucks, many of which are maintained by neighbors, are parked illegally. and dumped it with abandonment.
“We’ve seen the tourism industry approach pre-pandemic levels, and people are working from home and looking at it from a different angle,” said one city councilor. “It’s very much for the people who live there.”
Researchers have previously identified a so-called “ghosting effect,” in which selfies taken at popular destinations – like those in front of a bridge – tend to render the place itself. skewed, focusing instead almost entirely on the person’s own image.
Academics have suggested that increasing social narcissism may be interspersed with traveling; a traditional pursuit fueled by vagabond now seems to be a lethargic self-absorption. If historic sites and sacred spaces begin to be marketed as mere backdrops, will we witness the slow eradication of cultural heritage?