News

Supreme Court tells HCs to write rulings in easy-to-understand language | India News


NEW DELHI: Keep constitutional court judges away from sentences with complicated language and style in an easy-to-understand way, Supreme Court sent an “incomprehensible” judgment to Himachal Pradesh The high court for the new review said that the sentences must be meaningful to the litigants.
Drive home this message with lucid explanations, eliminating the use of rough expressions, a DY Judge’s bench Chandrachud and LIKE Bopanna The use of complex and lengthy sentences in judgments undermined the distribution of justice because they confused litigants about how and why a court would make a decision, said Tuesday. make a specific decision.

The main job of language is communication. It would be a form of off-target if it was used for obfuscation. Judgments and orders often involve ordinary people and they should be understandable to them. The Supreme Court was right. But it also needs to create a mechanism to ensure that comments are translated into action.

Watch time:

Judgment limit of a detachment bench of Himachal Pradesh HC “Unintelligible” and “difficult to navigate” even for Supreme Court justices, who have spent more than two decades as constitutional court judges, the bench said, “An incumbent where the sentence is primarily significant will be placed in an even more difficult situation than the Ministry. Without any legal training, the litigant is confronted with language that is not heard, written, or spoken in contemporary terms.”
Writing the verdict, Justice Chandrachud said, “Type language in a judgment defeats the purpose of judicial writing. Writing judgments by category before we appeal reduces the efficiency of the adjudication process. The purpose of judicial writing is not to confuse or confuse the reader behind the guise of complex language. ”
The presiding judge said judgments are valid in advance and not only for judges or lawyers.
Another important aspect of judgment writing – brevity – has become a victim in the age of cut-paste-copy convenience provided by computer software, a Justice knowledgeable about lament technology. Chandrahcudthe person conducting the proceedings paperless using the soft copy of the case file.
While giving broad guidelines for writing judgments, the curator says they don’t intend to kill the flair and style of writing judgments, which are unique to each judge’s way of expressing his thoughts.





Source link

goznews

Goz News: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably.

Related Articles

Back to top button